- Skip Navigation |
- Sitemap |
- Text Size: A |
- A |
- A
- Make a Complaint
- About Us
- FAQs
- Legislation
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Publications
- Sample Cases
- Languages Act
- Disability Act 2005
The Office of the Ombudsman is open between 9.15 and 5.30 Monday to Thursday and 9.15 to 5.15 on Friday.
18 Lr. Leeson Street, Dublin 2.
Tel: +353-1-639 5600
Lo-call: 1890 223030
Fax: (01) 639 5674 Email: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.ie
Annual Report of the Ombudsman 2003
Chapter 4 - Redress for Taxpayers - Implementation of Recommendations
Redress for Taxpayers- Implementation of Recommendations
Following my predecessor Kevin Murphy's, Special Report to the
Oireachtas - "Redress for Taxpayers" - the intervention of the Joint
Oireachtas Committee on Finance and the Public Service resulted in the
full implementation of his recommendations (full details of the
recommendations can be found at page 36 of the Ombudsman's Annual
Report for 2002).
There were two issues of concern in the investigation:
- time limits on retrospective refunds of tax wrongly collected, and
- compensation for loss of value where tax refunds are made in
cases where overpayments of tax were the result of maladministration.
I understand that Revenue has made refunds of tax, as well as
compensation payments for loss of purchasing power, to the widows whose
complaints were at the heart of the investigation. Following acceptance
of the recommendations in full, the Revenue also undertook a range of
initiatives to ensure that any similarly affected widows would be
identified. To date, refunds of taxes have been made in 131 cases,
compensation payments have been made in 185 cases, and an additional 49
cases are still being reviewed.
The total cost of implementing the recommendations to date
amounts to just over €900,000. The potential cost of implementing the
recommendations in full was estimated by the Revenue at the Oireachtas
Joint Committee briefing as running to €3.8 million. This estimate had
been relied on as a defence against implementation. The significantly
lower cost of implementation must give rise to regret that more
realistic and accurate estimates had not been prepared at an earlier
stage which, perhaps, might have facilitated an earlier resolution of
the entire issue.
A general scheme of compensation for loss of value in respect of
refunds of taxes - recommendation five of the Special Report - was
introduced with effect from 1 November 2003. The scheme provides for a
general right of repayment of taxes and duties, as well as payment of
interest on all such repayments subject to certain conditions. The
scheme, which is subject to transitional arrangements, introduces a
new, and more restrictive, four year limit for making claims to replace
the existing 10 year limit.
Payment of interest will be made by Revenue from the date that
tax was paid until the date of repayment, in cases where Revenue has
made an error in the application of the law. In all other cases,
including repayments of preliminary tax, interest will be payable from
the period beginning six months after a valid claim for the repayment
has been made, where the Revenue has not made the repayment by that
time.
I welcome the response of the Revenue in implementing the
recommendations of the Special Report. I am particularly pleased to see
the flexible approach which Revenue has adopted in the case of certain
widows who might not otherwise have been entitled to refunds and
compensation. This group of claimants had not, in fact, claimed the
refunds due to them under the O'Carroll judgment within the
required time frame and could, in theory, have been excluded from the
import of the Ombudsman's recommendations. Revenue has in fact adopted
a pragmatic and flexible approach in these cases and full payments have
been made.
