- Skip Navigation |
- Sitemap |
- Text Size: A |
- A |
- A
- Make a Complaint
- About Us
- FAQs
- Legislation
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Publications
- Sample Cases
- Languages Act
- Disability Act 2005
The Office of the Ombudsman is open between 9.15 and 5.30 Monday to Thursday and 9.15 to 5.15 on Friday.
18 Lr. Leeson Street, Dublin 2.
Tel: +353-1-639 5600
Lo-call: 1890 223030
Fax: (01) 639 5674 Email: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.ie
Annual Report of the Ombudsman 2003
Chapter 4 - Public Bodies and Access to Information
Public Bodies and Access to Information
During the examination of a planning enforcement case against Louth
County Council, which is ongoing, the Council compiled a report on its
investigations into allegations of environmental pollution and illegal
waste disposal. When the complainant sought a copy of the report the
Council wrote to her and informed her that she would have to submit a
Freedom of Information (FOI) request. I could see no valid reason why
the document could not have been given to the complainant outside of
the Freedom of Information Act, 1997 and there was no evidence to
suggest that the Council had considered this option. When my staff
conveyed my concern to the Council the document was released, free of
charge, to the complainant.
I am also aware, from an answer given by the Minister for
Justice, Equality and Law Reform in the Dáil in November 2003, that his
Department had a policy of not disclosing reasons for refusing an
individual a certificate of naturalisation. Failed applicants were
advised to apply for access to their records by means of a FOI request.
The Minister's answer indicated that the policy had ceased and that
reasons are now normally given for refusals.
As Ombudsman I believe it is of paramount importance that public
bodies should deal openly with people by disclosing information
available to them to the public with the minimum of restrictions and in
a prompt manner, unless there are valid statutory or other grounds for
restricting or refusing the information. I would be very concerned if a
pattern emerges of public bodies becoming less open by insisting that
members of the public use FOI requests to obtain information which
should be made available without recourse to the FOI Act. This is of
even more importance since the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Act,
2003 enabled the introduction of fees for non-personal information
requested under the Act.
